On Decision-Making Under Ambiguity

๐—ช๐—ฒ ๐˜๐—ฎ๐—น๐—ธ ๐—ฎ๐—ฏ๐—ผ๐˜‚๐˜ ๐˜€๐˜๐—ฟ๐—ฎ๐˜๐—ฒ๐—ด๐˜† ๐—ฎ๐˜€ ๐—ถ๐—ณ ๐—ถ๐˜ ๐˜„๐—ฒ๐—ฟ๐—ฒ ๐—ฎ๐—ป๐—ฎ๐—น๐˜†๐˜€๐—ถ๐˜€. ๐—œ๐—ป ๐—ฟ๐—ฒ๐—ฎ๐—น๐—ถ๐˜๐˜†, ๐—ถ๐˜โ€™๐˜€ ๐—ฐ๐—ฎ๐—ฝ๐—ฎ๐—ฐ๐—ถ๐˜๐˜†.

Most leaders donโ€™t lack data. They lack ambiguity tolerance.

Strategy and innovation donโ€™t fail because information is missing. They fail because decision makers wait for consensus.

Debate feels intelligent. Movement feels exposed.

But markets reward action - not analysis paralysis.

The real question isnโ€™t whether you have enough data. - Itโ€™s whether youโ€™ve built the capacity to act under ambiguity.

And that capacity can be trained.